Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

Last post 05-08-2008, 9:21 PM by Anonymous. 771 replies.
Page 1 of 52 (772 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  02-28-2007, 5:00 PM 162

    social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    On February 15, 2007, United States Congressman Mike Honda (CA - 15) introduced House Resolution 121, calling upon the governance of Japan to formally acknowledge and apologize for exploiting over 200,000 women (mostly Korean) as "sexual slaves" during their imperialist era (1930s) to World War II.  Since 1992, Korean "comfort women" and others have protested weekly in front of the Japanese embassy in South Korea, demanding an apology.  

    Attached is more info on this topic provided by the Korean American Voters' Council (www.koreanvoter.com)

    Please take this survey and share your thoughts.  Also, can we get a "social justice" forum in grooted please?

    should Japan Apologize?

    • Yes, but only to the "comfort women" (50%)
    • No, United States should not intervene (33.3%)
    • Yes, they should apologize to South Korea and to the "comfort women" (16.7%)
    • No, Japan has already taken responsibility for their actions (0%)
    You voted for 'No, United States should not intervene'.
    • Total Votes: 6

    effecting change one relation at a time.
  •  02-28-2007, 5:43 PM 163 in reply to 162

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    I think Japan should apologize and I feel horrible for those women.  But at the same time, I don't think the US should intervene.  I wonder if the legislative body of Japan ever tried to pass resolution asking the US to apologize for slavery??
    Filed under:
  •  03-01-2007, 6:16 AM 164 in reply to 163

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    Of course, US has lost global credibility and many argue that less international policing with more domestic focus would be better.  But I still believe that we are a global leader and a powerhouse.  And with that power, we have an obligation to the global community to provide not only some level of protection but set the value system.  In fact, grooter JXC has posted an interesting forum discussing whether NYC should apologize for slavery which would give more teeth and credibility to a resolution like H. 121 because after all, if we can't own up to our mistakes, how can we call upon other states to live up to theirs??


    I groot for the underdogs.
  •  03-01-2007, 5:35 PM 167 in reply to 164

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    The Japanese themselves should decide (not the U.S. or any other foreign power) whether to apologize or not for past decisions made in their name.  An apology would be a sign of political maturity (for democratic institutions) as well as peace offering to Asian neighbors who believe they were victimized by Japanese imperialism during this period.  It would symbolize Japan's acknowledgment and responsibility for past actions as well as their ability to move forward.  Unfortunately, this seems not to be the case.

    ---

    Today: March 01, 2007 at 11:9:58 PST

     

    Japan's Abe: No Proof of WWII Sex Slaves

    By KOZO MIZOGUCHI
    ASSOCIATED PRESS

    TOKYO (AP) -

    Japan's nationalist prime minister denied Thursday that the country's military forced women into sexual slavery during World War II, casting doubt on a past government apology and jeopardizing a fragile detente with his Asian neighbors.

    The comments by Shinzo Abe, a member of a group of lawmakers pushing to roll back a 1993 apology to the sex slaves, were his clearest statement as prime minister on military brothels known in Japan as "comfort stations."

    Historians say some 200,000 women - mostly from Korea and China - served in the Japanese military brothels throughout Asia in the 1930s and 1940s. Many victims say they were kidnapped and forced into sexual slavery by Japanese troops.

    But Abe, who since taking office in September has promoted patriotism in Japan's schools and a more assertive foreign policy, told reporters there was no proof the women were forced into prostitution.

    "The fact is, there is no evidence to prove there was coercion," Abe said.

    His remarks contradicted evidence in Japanese documents unearthed in 1992 that historians said showed military authorities had a direct role in working with contractors to forcibly procure women for the brothels.

    The documents, which are backed up by accounts from soldiers and victims, said Japanese authorities set up the brothels in response to uncontrolled rape sprees by invading Japanese soldiers in East Asia.

    In 1993, then-Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono apologized to the victims of sex slavery, though the statement did not meet demands by former "comfort women" that it be approved by parliament. Two years later, the government set up a compensation fund for victims, but it was based on private donations - not government money - and has been criticized as a way for the government to avoid owning up to the abuse.

    The mandate for the fund is to expire March 31.

    Abe's comments were certain to rile South Korea and China, which accuse Tokyo of failing to fully atone for wartime atrocities. Abe's government has been recently working to repair relations with Seoul and Beijing.

    The statement came just hours after South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun marked a national holiday honoring the anniversary of a 1919 uprising against Japanese colonial rule by urging Tokyo to come clean about its past.

    Roh also referred to hearings held by the U.S. House of Representatives last month on a resolution urging Japan to "apologize for and acknowledge" the imperial army's use of sex slaves during the war.

    "The testimony reiterated a message that no matter how hard the Japanese try to cover the whole sky with their hand, there is no way that the international community would condone the atrocities committed during Japanese colonial rule," Roh said.

    Dozens of people also rallied outside the Japanese Embassy in Seoul to mark the anniversary, lining up dead dogs' heads on the ground with pieces of paper in their mouths listing names of Koreans who allegedly collaborated with the Japanese during its 1910-45 colonial rule. Protest organizers said the animals were slaughtered at a restaurant; dogs are regularly consumed as food in Korea.

    Roh's office said late Thursday it did not immediately have a direct response to the Japanese leader's remarks. In Beijing, calls to the Chinese Foreign Ministry seeking comment on the remarks were not immediately returned.

    State Department spokesman Sean McCormack would not comment on Abe's statement. "I'll let the Japanese political system deal with that," he said.

    The sex slave question has been a cause celebre for nationalist politicians and scholars in Japan who claim the women were professional prostitutes and were not coerced into servitude by the military.

    Before Abe spoke Thursday, a group of ruling Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers discussed their plans to push for an official revision of Kono's 1993 apology.

    Nariaki Nakayama, chairman of the group of about 120 lawmakers, sought to play down the government's involvement in the brothels by saying it was similar to a school that hires a company to run its cafeteria.

    "Some say it is useful to compare the brothels to college cafeterias run by private companies, who recruit their own staff, procure foodstuffs, and set prices," he said.

    "Where there's demand, businesses crop up ... but to say women were forced by the Japanese military into service is off the mark," he said. "This issue must be reconsidered, based on truth ... for the sake of Japanese honor."

    Sex slave victims, however, say they still suffer wounds - physical and psychological - from the war.

    Lee Yong-soo, 78, a South Korean who was interviewed during a recent trip to Tokyo, said she was 14 when Japanese soldiers took her from her home in 1944 to work as a sex slave in Taiwan.

    "The Japanese government must not run from its responsibilities," said Lee, who has long campaigned for Japanese compensation. "I want them to apologize. To admit that they took me away, when I was a little girl, to be a sex slave. To admit that history."

    ---

    AP writer Burt Herman contributed to this report from Seoul, South Korea.

    http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/w-asia/2007/mar/01/030100716.html

     


    The world is a skirt I want to lift up.
    -Hanif Kureishi, author (1954- )
  •  03-01-2007, 11:48 PM 169 in reply to 162

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    thanks for the request grooter liaison, the social justice forum was created.

    member services

    for any customer service issues or questions, please post to the member services forum or send a private message via email: members@grooted.org
    Filed under:
  •  03-06-2007, 9:34 AM 179 in reply to 167

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    Here's a recent article op-ed from the NY Times on this situation:

    March 6, 2007
    Editorial

    No Comfort

    What part of “Japanese Army sex slaves” does Japan’s prime minister, Shinzo Abe, have so much trouble understanding and apologizing for?

    The underlying facts have long been beyond serious dispute. During World War II, Japan’s Army set up sites where women rounded up from Japanese colonies like Korea were expected to deliver sexual services to Japan’s soldiers.

    These were not commercial brothels. Force, explicit and implicit, was used in recruiting these women. What went on in them was serial rape, not prostitution. The Japanese Army’s involvement is documented in the government’s own defense files. A senior Tokyo official more or less apologized for this horrific crime in 1993. The unofficial fund set up to compensate victims is set to close down this month.

    And Mr. Abe wants the issue to end there. Last week, he claimed that there was no evidence that the victims had been coerced. Yesterday, he grudgingly acknowledged the 1993 quasi apology, but only as part of a pre-emptive declaration that his government would reject the call, now pending in the United States Congress, for an official apology. America isn’t the only country interested in seeing Japan belatedly accept full responsibility. Korea and China are also infuriated by years of Japanese equivocations over the issue.

    Mr. Abe seems less concerned with repairing Japan’s sullied international reputation than with appealing to a large right-wing faction within his Liberal Democratic Party that insists that the whole shameful episode was a case of healthy private enterprise. One ruling party lawmaker, in his misplaced zeal to exculpate the Army, even suggested the offensive analogy of a college that outsourced its cafeteria to a private firm.

    Japan is only dishonored by such efforts to contort the truth.

    The 1993 statement needs to be expanded upon, not whittled down. Parliament should issue a frank apology and provide generous official compensation to the surviving victims. It is time for Japan’s politicians — starting with Mr. Abe — to recognize that the first step toward overcoming a shameful past is acknowledging it.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/opinion/06tues3.html?_r\u003d1&oref\u003dslogin>

    Filed under:
  •  03-06-2007, 3:19 PM 180 in reply to 179

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    so I've been receiving feedbacks from various individuals and organizations regarding this topic, ranging from think thanks in Japan to witnesses who testified in front of Represenative Honda.  there seems to be four types of involved activists here: 1) Those who are involved at the ground level and compiling petitions to support this cause; 2) those who are policy-oriented and think that this resolution will affect global foreign policy; 3) those who are emotionally affected and even scarred by this matter; and 4) those who are simply questioning whether the US should even be involved.

    groups one, two, and three should be collaborating to fuel a "groundUP" campaign to achieve a shared outcome but it seems like there are some fundamental hurdles pertaining to personality conflicts, clash of egos and generational/cultural gap among the stakeholders of this campaign.

    I groot for the underdogs.
  •  03-09-2007, 8:31 PM 193 in reply to 167

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    JXC - should the process of democratic maturity and global democratization be fueled by a preeminent nation??  Has democratization ever been a groundUP process??
    I groot for the underdogs.
    Filed under:
  •  03-21-2007, 1:14 PM 233 in reply to 193

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    I received a forwarded email about a press conference March 22 in DC to lobby congress to support H. Reso 121 and I found this discussion online …

     

    First, why is this a global problem that needs the time and energy of the US federal legislature?  When the legislative bodies pass a bill or resolution, there must be a clear problem that needs the attention of government intervention or solution; otherwise, it will merely be a symbolic gesture with no tangible returns.  In this particular case, is the US flexing their muscles again to impose their power on Japan? This is a Japan-Asia matter and the US should focus on spending taxpayers’ money fixing local problems.

     

    Would you rebut by saying that this is a matter of foreign policy?  Of course it is if you are for the perpetuation of western preponderance and pretentiousness.


    It’s very easy to manipulate the public by telling the stories of cohorts of violated sex slaves during Japan’s imperialistic era to get the people emotionally charged up.   But the federal government must use sound judgment in realizing that this is not a US issue and leave this matter to the United Nations.

    http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ca15_honda/COMFORTWOMEN.html

  •  04-03-2007, 11:42 AM 254 in reply to 233

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    Japan should apoligze but US should stay out of it!
  •  07-10-2007, 7:16 AM 450 in reply to 254

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

    The US has always been a moral compass for the world and just because of recent mishaps in the middle east, it doesn't mean we should stop trying to lead the world in determining what's right and what's wrong.  In this case, calling upon Japan to apologize is the the right thing to do. 

  •  12-02-2007, 3:23 PM 662 in reply to 164

    Re: social justice issue - Should Japan Apologize?

  •  12-15-2007, 2:01 PM 911 in reply to 164

    banca credito cooperativo nettuno on line

Page 1 of 52 (772 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML